This week is banned books week. There are a lot of books I
love that have landed on this list over the years: To Kill a Mockingbird, Animal
Farm and the Harry Potter series
to name a few. But today I want to write about my least favorite book from this
list: The Catcher in the Rye.
I studied Children’s Literature in my graduate program and
one of the books I was assigned to read was J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye. I came into the
book with no preconceived notions—the title felt familiar to me—I had heard of it
in passing but knew nothing of the book itself. I read it and strongly disliked
the book.
I came to class that week not excited for the discussion at
all. But in the course of the discussion, a classmate of mine said, “Holden
Caulfield is my hero,” and my ears perked up. She went on to tell how this book
was so meaningful to her as a teenager and she looked up to Holden Caulfield –
he was her childhood hero. My first thought was, “Wow. We had very different
childhoods.” As I went on to listen to her, I came to realize what great value
this book held for her. By the end of
the class I didn’t like the book anymore than when I began, but I saw its
value.
Ironically, the book we discussed the very next week was Little Women—talk about two different
books! I read the book while underlining passages and using the back of my hand
to wipe away my tears. That class started out with a collective groan from many
of the students because they had found the book so boring. The juxtaposition of
these two books and my experience with Little
Women and my classmate’s experience with The Catcher in the Rye showed me, in a very real way, the need for
a diversity of books.
My initial thought of “Wow. We had very different
childhoods” was true. We grew up in different homes, in different states, and in
different circumstances, so it only makes sense that we would be drawn to
different books. Often in the banned books dialogue, we talk about how people who
seek to ban books might like the books they try to ban if they actually read
them. This may be true in some circumstances. However, I think the more
important discussion is about the value a book holds for someone else, even if
it is a book that you don’t like, think is inappropriate, or would never have
your child read.
Every year when banned books week rolls around, I think of The Catcher in the Rye and I hope it,
and other books like it, make it into the hands of someone like my
classmate—for whom it was the perfect book at the perfect time.
1 comment:
I completely agree with this. I read this book following my degree and I was disgusted by it. But then with retrospect I can see the value to other people and maybe as a teenager it really would have appealed to me. Every book written has a purpose yet a separate meaning to the individual reader.
Post a Comment